The newsletter is out for the week. If you follow the blog, you know by now that we’re doing a sort of celebration of alternatives throughout this week, so it only made sense to have a newsletter that stayed in the same vein. We initially set out to celebrate Registered Investment Advisers (RIAs) who were bringing their clients alternatives- particularly managed futures. However, as we journeyed through the interviews for the piece, a more valuable story emerged: the tale of how the RIAs got to a point where they wanted to offer alternatives- and managed futures, in particular- at all.
We mentioned on the blog yesterday that the more important question than “Why alternatives?”- for us, at least- is “Why NOT alternatives?” To be honest, we haven’t come across any especially persuasive answers, but this week’s newsletter takes a stab at providing a big picture view of the cycle we see many RIAs go through on their way to offering actual alternative exposure. Our hope? That talking about this cycle will help other RIAs determine where they are in the journey- and which direction to go next. That individual investors will question their RIAs progress through the cycle, and what level of alternative exposure they actually have.
Yep, just more questions- but they’re the right ones to ask.
Click here to read more.
The performance data displayed herein is compiled from various sources, including BarclayHedge, and reports directly from the advisors. These performance figures should not be relied on independent of the individual advisor's disclosure document, which has important information regarding the method of calculation used, whether or not the performance includes proprietary results, and other important footnotes on the advisor's track record.
Benchmark index performance is for the constituents of that index only, and does not represent the entire universe of possible investments within that asset class. And further, that there can be limitations and biases to indices such as survivorship, self reporting, and instant history.
Managed futures accounts can subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The numbers within this website include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.
Investors interested in investing with a managed futures program (excepting those programs which are offered exclusively to qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7) will be required to receive and sign off on a disclosure document in compliance with certain CFT rules The disclosure documents contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the CTA, as well as the composite performance of accounts under the CTA's management over at least the most recent five years. Investor interested in investing in any of the programs on this website are urged to carefully read these disclosure documents, including, but not limited to the performance information, before investing in any such programs.
Those investors who are qualified eligible persons as that term is defined by CFTC regulation 4.7 and interested in investing in a program exempt from having to provide a disclosure document and considered by the regulations to be sophisticated enough to understand the risks and be able to interpret the accuracy and completeness of any performance information on their own.
RCM receives a portion of the commodity brokerage commissions you pay in connection with your futures trading and/or a portion of the interest income (if any) earned on an account's assets. The listed manager may also pay RCM a portion of the fees they receive from accounts introduced to them by RCM.