Better times right around the corner for Trend Following Systems
April 4, 2005
With 4 out of 5 trend following systems we track seeing double digit losses of between -10% and -15% in the first quarter, the beginning of 2005 is starting to look an awful lot like the middle of 2004, and that has a lot of trend following investors worried.
The middle of 2004 saw the trend following universe trying to survive some tough times. Famous trend following managed futures programs, or CTAs (Commodity Trading Advisors), with billions of dollars under management such as John W. Henry, Niederhoffer, Campbell &Co., and Dunn Capital were down anywhere between 5% to 40% on the year - with many seeing multiple losing months in a row.
The CSFB/ Tremont Managed Futures Index, meanwhile, was down -6.99% through the end of August 2004, and had seen six straight months of losses, the longest such streak since its inception in 1994.
So here we are in 2005, and trend following is starting to look lackluster again. Most of the CTA managers and trend following system developers we've talked to say this is just one of those non-trending environments where trend followers won't do well.
BUT the news has been flooded with stories of record high Crude Oil prices, a historically weak US dollar, and new highs commodity indexes like the CRB based on China's insatiable appetite for natural resources. If all these trends are going on, why aren't the trend following systems taking advantage?
Well, my quick advice is: "don't believe everything you see on CNBC". Take the grain markets, for example, the recent up trend there came on the heels of 10+ month down trend, yet the news would have you believe all commodity prices have been trending upwards like mad due to the Chinese. Likewise, stories of the falling US dollar are still in the news today, despite the fact that the dollar has rallied neatly off its lows.
The more involved answer is that many of the current trends we are seeing (Energies UP, Bonds DOWN, Dollar UP (foreign currencies down), and Grains UP are very tricky trends sharing some common characteristics. These trends are:
- Quick trends whose direction is counter to rather long trends that immediately preceded them
- Trends not being confirmed by the long term Rate of Change indicator
- Trends not being confirmed by the ADX trend indicator
We highlighted the US Dollar Index, 10 Yr Note, Crude Oil, and Soybean markets in the charts below, as those four are good proxies for the movements of the currency, interest rates, energy, and grain sectors. We added the ADX and ROC indicators to show there is more to a trend than just rising and falling prices, and also added some very basic red and blue trend lines to the charts.
The trendlines show that the current trends are all very small in magnitude and length of time compared to the trends immediately preceding them, and that they are all in the opposite direction of the rather lengthy trends that immediately preceded them. Trend followers usually catch trends emerging from a directionless, choppy environment - not an environment where the new trend is exactly opposite of the preceding one.
The ADX stands for the average directional index, and measures the "consistency" of the trend. A trend that gradually moves in one direction over a lengthy period of time will have a high ADX reading. Conversely, a quick 1-2 month trend up followed by a quick trend down, and so on will produce a lower ADX reading.
Looking at the charts below, we can see that the ADX was sideways or sloping down in the May to August 2004 period and that the ADX made swing highs (circled in yellow) in December of 2004 when trend followers were finishing off a very good 4th quarter. Despite somewhat recent ADX high points in the 10 Yr, Crude Oil, and Soybeans, the ADX indicator has started to slope downwards again, meaning we could already be in the directionless environment trend following systems bracket in hopes of a "break-out" to new highs or lows.
The ROC measures the rate of change, and we used a 100 day ROC in the charts below to see whether the trends were being confirmed by the overall, long term direction of the market. It is generally not a good idea to "fight" the overall direction of the market, thus going long when the ROC is negative and vice versa, but there is the potential for profits in getting into a reversal trend while waiting for the lagging ROC indicator to catch up and realize the old trend has ended.
Looking at the charts below, we can see that the ROC indicator was choppy, moving from positive to negative and so on in the May to August 2004 period for each market (with the exception of Crude Oil), and that each market is starting to show a choppy 100 day ROC again in the first quarter of 2005. This is telling us that despite what we hear on the news and despite what we see on the chart, many of these sectors do not have a distinct long term direction. This is obviously a bad thing for systems designed to capture the long term trends in markets, but there is a silver lining.
After reviewing the following charts, it does appear that we are in a market environment very similar to the one experienced in the middle of 2004.....and we should be so lucky. The last four months of 2004 were very good for trend followers, with the aforementioned CSFB Managed Futures Index posting four straight profitable months while gaining over 13% and trend following systems at Attain posting impressive gains to become the best performing system group of the year. So if this is a similar environment to the middle of 2004, with new trends about to form out of somewhat directionless conditions, you don't want to be sitting on the sidelines.
- Jeff Malec




![]()
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can
carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for
everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading
losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week |
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week |
Is volatility back? We sure hope so. Although US stock markets were down in March, the VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) was up 16.05% and the increased market activity proved helpful as many day and swing trading systems had their best months of 2005.
Last week marked the end of a tough quarter for trend followers, however. Trend reversals in the grain, foreign currency, and US bond markets caught many by surprise, resulting in negative returns for both trend following CTA’s and trading systems. Click on "Topic of the Week" to the left for more on trend following systems struggles.
Most trend following systems entered March long across several markets in the grain, foreign currency, US bond, and US stock market sectors. Overbought conditions in each of these sectors led to large downward moves across the board, however. Corn led the way falling -4.37%, followed by wheat -4.13%, Russell 2000 futures -2.86%, NASDAQ futures -2.72%, Eurocurrency -2.18%, Gold -2.07%, and SP 500 futures -2.02%.
There were huge rallies in the energy markets, meanwhile, with Crude Oil futures rising 5.81%, heating oil +14.43%, and unleaded gas up +15.20%.
**Day Trading**
The Founder suite of systems continued to bounce back from last year’s less than spectacular performance in March Helix SP took top honors for the month of March, earning $10,037.50 ($407.50 per ES). Cipher ES was close behind making $1,460 per emini contract, while Magnitude ES rounded the other two out making a modest $717.50 per contract.
BWT Rock N Russell had another stellar month, gaining another $7,244.80 per money management unit utilizing the position manager; and Compass made $3,149.25 to post back to back winning months for the first time in over a year. Elsewhere, the Electric DayBreaker portfolio provided returns of $957.50 per contract across it four markets (ES, NQ, eRL, and eMD), while R-Mesa treaded water for most of the month to come out ahead by $145.25.
On the losing side last month, RC Success ES unfortunately pulled back off of its equity highs, losing -$1,187.50 per emini contract, but is still positioned near the top of list for year-to date returns. RC Miracles ES was also down, losing -$1,660 for the month on about twice as many trades.
Other March results included BWT Zones SP losing -$2,739.50 and BWT Zones Russell giving back -$764.80 per contract. Day Breaker SP was fairly quiet for the month, but ended up losing -$1,019.25, while AG Xtreme traded almost four times per week, losing -$3,057.50. Clipper eRL and Impetus eRL both continued their 2005 struggles, with losses of $1,550.60 and $568.20 respectively per emini Russell contract.
**Swing Trading**
The increased volatility in March created some opportunities for swing trading systems. The trade of the month came from Tzar eRL, which came into the month long and reversed short just off the highs of the month. Two trades later the system locked in a grand total of +$2,526.00 per contract.
Not far behind were Eclipse eRL and Axiom ES, which recorded gains of +$1,222.7 and +$1,130 respectively. Other swing system gains came from Tzar NQ which made +$640 per contract on 4 trades and Axiom eRL which made +$640 on 2 trades. Tzar, Eclipse and Axiom are all currently holding short. The remaining markets for both systems were not as fortunate, with Axiom eMD losing -$1,502.60, Axiom NQ losing -$610 and Tzar ES losing -$250.
Rounding out the swing systems were Mesa Bonds and Mesa Notes, which finally got burned for holding long bond positions in the face of the Federal Reserves’ continued interest rate hikes. Bonds sold off in March, stopping out both systems. Mesa Bonds ended the month down -$3,370 and Mesa Notes lost -$1,804.70. Mesa Notes finally jumped on board with the short term momentum by reversing short on the last day of the month.
**Long Term**
As we highlight below, it was a tough quarter for most long term trend following systems as the profitable trends which drove profits at the end of 2004 unwound and in some cases reversed course.
Several profitable trends did develop in March with gains in the meat markets being most notable for system traders. Feeder Cattle was the big mover, rallying +8.03%, while live cattle was up 3.87%. Systems like Aberration +$380.00 per contract in live cattle, and SEMA4 Symmetry with +$175 per contract in the feeder cattle are the two systems holding long positions.
Most systems took it on the chin in the US bond and foreign currency sectors after entering the month long in markets like US 30 year bonds, US 10 year notes, Eurocurrency, and the Swiss Franc. Systems with losing trades in these markets included Andromeda which lost -$1128.30 in the 10 yr Notes, -$225.00 per contract in the muni-bonds, and -$1800.00 in the Eurobund.
Checkmate also had multiple positions stopped out, including a loss of -$1143.75 per contract in the ten years, -$721.88 in the five year notes, and -$2662.80 per contract in Eurocurrency. The system did rebound slightly with gains of +$262.80 per contract in the two year notes.
Finally, Axiom LT lost -$2887.50 and Brix lost -$1868.75per contract in the Swiss Franc. The struggles unfortunately didn’t end there, as many systems got stopped out of short grain trades. Andromeda, Fusion, and Synergy all were stopped out of short corn trades for losses of -$737.50 per contract, -$600.00 per contract, and -$487.50 per contract respectively. Soybeans had a very choppy month as crop disease in Brazil rallied the markets sharply, while later USDA reports that showed surpluses caused almost a sharp sell offs. Brix is the only system with a position in the beans, holding long for open trade profits of +$2975.00 per contract.
Please Login to: http://www.attainaccess.com for the latest updated statistics.
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can
carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for
everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading
losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.