Semi Annual Top 15 CTAs and Trading Systems
July 14, 2008
We release our rankings twice a year to give investors a concise summary of the trading systems and CTAs we believe have the best chance for success moving forward. We are not content to merely show you the best performers this year or a list of the top returns of all time, and instead want the rankings to reflect the risk of the program, consistency of returns, and experience of the manager as well.
For this reason, our rankings have developed over the years into a comprehensive tool which ranks systems across over 25 different metrics measuring performance, risk, experience, and more. The rankings are designed to show which programs are consistently amongst the top rated across all of the different statistical measures important to this type of investment.
Many investors are in search of a "holy grail" investment which has low risk, high average returns, a multi-year track record, and of course - impressive recent gains, and this eternal search for trading's "holy grail" leads investors to quickly weed through hundreds of trading systems and managed futures programs by asking anyone who will respond to show them their BEST. But what are you really asking when putting this question to these "experts"? What is BEST supposed to mean, anyway? Best this month, this year? Best for all time? Best risk adjusted return? Best in terms of lowest Drawdowns?
Aren't we being short sighted when asking to see the BEST system or CTA in one category or another? The real question should probably be more along the lines of: "What system or CTA is consistently amongst the top rated across all of the different statistical measures important to this type of investment?"
This is exactly what our rankings have been designed to do: See which trading systems and CTAs are the BEST across several statistics, then see which are consistently among those on each list - and therefore the BEST overall.
THE TRADING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IN THE FOLLOWING TABLES SHOW HYPOTHETICAL MODEL ACCOUNTS. PLEASE SEE IMPORTANT RISK DISCLAIMER BELOW.
THE CTA PERFORMANCE IN THE FOLLOWING TABLES SHOW ACTUAL PERFORMANCE AS REPORTED BY EACH CTA. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
We begin by looking at which systems and CTAs are the BEST by the YTD returns thus far in 2008. This is unfortunately the measure most investors use to determine what investment is best for them, and the reason the year's hot system or CTA is usually regarded as the BEST. The downside to this analysis, of course, is that it ignores risk. A high return is nice, but at what cost. The BEST performers so far this year are the following:
| Top 5 Systems By YTD Return | Top 5 CTAs by YTD Return | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | YTD Return | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | YTD Return | Init Cap (000S) |
| Compass SP | 83.09% | 30 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Millennium | 80.13% | 1000 |
| AG Mechwarrior ES | 48.21% | 15 | NDX Capital Management Shadrach | 40.83% | 100 |
| TZAR NQ | 32.96% | 30 | Attain Portfolio Advisors - Modified Program | 35.38% | 250 |
| Ultramini EMD | 29.60% | 15 | Pere Trading Group | 35.28% | 50 |
| TZAR ES | 27.36% | 30 | Vision Capital Mgmt | 31.74% | 250 |
While systems such as AG Mechwarrior and Compass SP, and CTAs such as Pere Trading Group and Attain's own Modified program are among the BEST this year, a simple change to looking at total return over the life of the investment quickly inserts others into the top 5 lists such as Mesa Bonds for systems, and the venerable Clarke and Ace for CTAs. The newer programs drop out of the top 5 lists altogether, due to not enough history to build up a significant track record. The BEST programs by Total Return have been the following:
| Top 5 Systems By Total Return | Top 5 CTAs by Total Return | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Total Return | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | Total Return | Init Cap (000S) |
| TZAR ES | 556.66% | 30 | Rosetta | 5259.97% | 50 |
| MESA Bonds | 520.92% | 30 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Global Basic | 2316.46% | 100 |
| SeasonalST NQ | 393.67% | 20 | Robinson Langley | 1619.63% | 100 |
| TZAR NQ | 383.38% | 30 | LJM | 1253.24% | 500 |
| Ultramini EMD | 377.47% | 15 | ACE Investment Strategists, LLC SIPC | 962.42% | 75 |
Its easy to play devil's advocate when looking at the total return table and say how it unfairly treats newer systems and CTAs. It admittedly takes a while to build up significant total return numbers, and for that reason looking at the compound rate of return for CTAs, and non compounded rate of return for systems can make more sense. This measure is more of a "what to expect" than a "what has happened" measure. And sure enough, you will see that the Best by Compound ROR includes "newer" CTAs (in the CTA world, newer means less than 3 years of history) such as Vision Capital and Optimus.
| Top 5 Systems By Non-Comp RoR | Top 5 CTAs by Compound RoR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Non-Comp RoR | Init Cap (000S) | Since | CTA Program | Comp RoR | Init Cap (000S) | Since |
| Ultramini EMD | 75.49% | 15 | 8/03 | Vision Capital Mgmt | 125.90% | 250 | 9/07 |
| SeasonalST NQ | 52.49% | 20 | 2/01 | Optimus | 77.29% | 75 | 8/07 |
| TZAR ES | 48.41% | 30 | 2/97 | Attain Portfolio Advisors - Modified Program | 67.76% | 250 | 2/07 |
| SeasonalST ERL | 47.18% | 20 | 11/01 | Ascendant Asset Advisors, Inc. Strategic2 Options | 63.84% | 100 | 8/05 |
| Compass SP | 42.75% | 30 | 3/00 | Rosetta | 62.03% | 50 | 4/00 |
Non Compounded ROR = the annual ROR, whose simple arithmetic sum over the total number of years in the period analyzed, yields the cumulative gain/loss for the program during that period. Compound ROR = the annual ROR which, if compounded over the number of years in the period being analyzed, would yield the cumulative gain/loss for the program during that period |
|||||||
But what if we think of BEST not as the one that surpasses all others, but rather the one which is most suitable for me. The question in that case should not be, "What is your BEST system and CTA?" The question should be: "What is MY BEST system and CTA?", or in a more grammatically correct form: "What is the best system and CTA for me?"
To find what system or CTA is the BEST for you, a little soul searching is required. Are you interested in the absolute highest return? Lowest drawdown? Best mixture of the two, perhaps? Or perhaps you think the best system or CTA is the one which has been around the longest. There is surely something to be said for longevity. You will quickly find that different systems and CTAs head many of these lists, showing that finding the BEST is an elusive target indeed.
To begin to filter things down, we must incorporate the riskiness of each system and CTA. Many investors look at Drawdown to get a feeling of the risk involved. But concentrating solely on drawdown is just as bad as looking only at return. For starters, a system or CTA could have a very low drawdown because it has only been trading for a short period of time. (note the Hoffman program which started in 2007) The BEST systems and CTAs for 'lowest' maximum drawdown have been:
| Top 5 Systems By Lowest Max DD | Top 5 CTAs by Lowest Max DD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Max DD | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | Max DD | Init Cap (000S) |
| Polaris YM | 10.72% | 20 | Futures Truth Connecticut HiProb US | 0.00% | 1000 |
| Polaris ES | 14.06% | 20 | Zenith Resources Index Options | 3.74% | 100 |
| HP Intraday Breakout ERL | 20.80% | 10 | Cervino Capital Management LLC Diversified Options | 4.47% | 50 |
| Polaris EMD | 21.35% | 20 | Hoffman Asset Management, Inc. Managed Account 2 | 4.78% | 125 |
| Ultramini ES | 23.12% | 15 | NDX Capital Management Abednego | 4.80% | 50 |
But as nice as it is too see a low drawdown, low risk doesn't really help if there is also no return. We can always invest in treasury bills if we want zero risk. The next logical step, therefore, is to evaluate which systems have the BEST return per unit of risk. . This is accomplished through the use of several risk adjusted ratios. The first of these is the Sharpe ratio, which measures returns divided by risk (as measured by the standard deviation of returns, or volatility). The formula actually uses the amount of return over the risk free rate. Attain uses 2% as the risk free rate of return in its calculations. The systems and CTAs with the BEST Sharpe ratios have been:
| Top 5 Systems By Sharpe Ratio | Top 5 CTAs by Sharpe Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Sharpe Ratio | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | Sharpe Ratio | Init Cap (000S) |
| Ultramini EMD | 2.19 | 15 | Futures Truth Connecticut HiProb US | 3.20 | 1000 |
| Ultramini ES | 1.5 | 15 | Zenith Resources Index Options | 2.87 | 100 |
| TZAR ES | 1.48 | 30 | Crescent Bay Capital Management Balanced Volatility | 2.65 | 25 |
| SeasonalST ERL | 1.32 | 20 | NDX Capital Management Methuselah | 2.61 | 40 |
| Polaris ES | 1.19 | 20 | Hoffman Asset Management, Inc. Managed Account 2 | 2.39 | 125 |
One of the problems with using the Sharpe ratio is that it punishes systems and CTAs for having a high upside volatility profile. For example, the Compass system had a one month gain of +74% in 2002, which caused the volatility reading for the system to skyrocket. But it can be argued that upside volatility is of no concern, as that means large positive monthly gains in the distribution of returns. Does it mean an investment is more risky if it has a huge monthly GAIN? Usually not - we think a huge monthly loss is much more important when measuring risk. There is a risk measure which eliminates the upside volatility skew from the Sharpe ratio by using the volatility of negative returns only. This measure is called the Sortino ratio. The BEST systems and CTAs by Sortino ratio have been:
| Top 5 Systems By Sortino Ratio | Top 5 CTAs by Sortino Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Sortino Ratio | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | Sortino Ratio | Init Cap (000S) |
| Ultramini EMD | 4.48 | 15 | Futures Truth Connecticut HiProb US | 99.99 | 1000 |
| TZAR ES | 3.30 | 30 | Crescent Bay Capital Management Balanced Volatility | 13.66 | 25 |
| Ultramini ES | 2.60 | 15 | Attain Portfolio Advisors - Modified Program | 8.55 | 250 |
| Polaris ES | 2.52 | 20 | Hoffman Asset Management, Inc. Managed Account 2 | 6.79 | 125 |
| Compass SP | 2.43 | 30 | NDX Capital Management Methuselah | 5.91 | 40 |
The Sharpe and Sortino ratios have a flaw, however, in that they view the volatility of returns as the main ingredient of risk. This speaks nothing of what sort of drawdown had to be encountered to get the return. As many managed futures investors can attest to, it is the drawdown period which represent the most risky part of the investment, not the volatility of returns. The Sterling ratio measures returns divided by risk (as measured by drawdown). The BEST systems and CTAs by Sterling Ratio have been:
| Top 5 Systems By Sterling Ratio | Top 5 CTAs by Sterling Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Sterling Ratio | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | Sterling Ratio | Init Cap (000S) |
| Ultramini EMD | 3.23 | 15 | Vision Capital Mgmt | 4.46 | 250 |
| TZAR ES | 1.65 | 30 | Crescent Bay Capital Management Balanced Volatility | 4.29 | 25 |
| Ultramini ES | 1.50 | 15 | NDX Capital Management Methuselah | 3.33 | 40 |
| SeasonalST ERL | 1.22 | 20 | Attain Portfolio Advisors - Modified Program | 3.31 | 250 |
| TZAR NQ | 1.14 | 30 | Futures Truth Connecticut HiProb US | 3.28 | 1000 |
One last piece if information it is important to take into consideration is the length of track record. The above tables have looked at systems and CTAs with at least six months of data, but measures such as the Sharpe ratio are usually computed on at least 3 years of data. The shorter the length of a track period, the greater the margin of error in the statistics. Thus a CTA such as Optimus or Vision Capital; or systems such as Ultramini, which look very nice atop many of the BEST tables above, could have a larger margin of error given their relatively short track records. The longer someone has been at it, the more faith we can put in the stats. The BEST systems and CTAs by length of track record are:
| Top 5 Systems By Length of Track Record | Top 5 CTAs by Length of Track Record | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | Track Record (months) | Init Cap (000S) | CTA Program | Track Record (months) | Init Cap (000S) |
| Compass SP | 100 | 30 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Worldwide | 150 | 250 |
| Mesa Notes | 60 | 30 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Global Basic | 149 | 100 |
| Tzar ES | 58 | 30 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Global Magnum | 131 | 100 |
| Jaws US 60 | 57 | 35 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Millennium | 126 | 1000 |
| Tzar NQ | 52 | 30 | LJM | 113 | 500 |
So what systems and CTAs are the best overall? It again depends on what you are looking for, but the overall picture does have some clues. We don't have space to list the rankings for all 25 categories we look at, but we have listed the Top 15 trading system, and Top 15 CTAs we follow at Attain (these rankings are on our lists, and not inclusive of the entire universe of systems and CTAs)
Our rankings define the BEST systems and CTAs mathematically. All programs are ranked in each category, and then an overall ranking is computed. So a program which is ranked between #10 and #30 in each category will be ranked higher overall than a program which is ranked #1 in a single category, but averages in the 50s to 100s for the rest of the categories. Programs in the top 20th percentile of the overall rankings are awarded 5 'flags' on our website, the second 20th percentile 4 flags, and so on, down to the bottom 20th percentile being given a ranking of just 1 flag. More flags signify a higher overall ranking, and a program listed above another program with the same number of flags is ranked higher than the lower one.
Best Overall? Attain's Top Fifteen
| Top 15 Trading Systems | Top 15 CTAs | ||||||||
| Trading System | Non Comp ROR | Max DD | Since | Min Inv 000s | CTA Program | Comp RoR | Max DD | Since | Min Inv 000s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tzar ES | 48.41% | 36.08% | 2/97 | 30 | Zenith Resources - Index Option Program | 22.72% | 3.74% | 12/99 | 50 |
| Compass SP | 42.01% | 82.14% | 3/00 | 30 | ACE Investment Strategists, LLC SIPC | 41.92% | 28.31% | 10/01 | 75 |
| Signum EBL | 21.55% | 55.87% | 2/91 | 40 | NDX Capital Management Methuselah | 50.22% | 6.13% | 6/07 | 40 |
| MESA Notes | 14.71% | 38.29% | 3/90 | 30 | Dighton Capital USA Swiss Futures Trading | 57.47% | 36.91% | 7/03 | 100 |
| TZAR NQ | 42.60% | 66.43% | 8/99 | 30 | Hoffman Asset Management, Inc. Managed Account 2 | 40.23% | 4.78% | 4/07 | 125 |
| MESA Bonds | 28.41% | 78.73% | 4/90 | 30 | NDX Capital Management Shadrach Program | 49.62% | 13.67% | 10/06 | 100 |
| Polaris EMD | 20.61% | 21.35% | 4/02 | 20 | Futures Truth Connecticut HiProb US | 32.79% | 0.00% | 8/06 | 1000 |
| Bounce ERL | 22.04% | 36.59% | 12/01 | 10 | Rosetta Capital Management, LLC | 62.03% | 39.67% | 4/00 | 50 |
| Waugh ERL | 20.22% | 44.76% | 11/01 | 10 | Crescent Bay Capital Management Balanced Volatility | 60.06% | 7.84% | 8/07 | 10 |
| Bounce ERL Swing | 18.31% | 30.0% | 2/02 | 10 | Vision Capital Management, LLC Global Futures (Client) | 125.9% | 27.46% | 9/07 | 250 |
| HP Intraday Breakout ERL | 12.51% | 20.80% | 11/02 | 10 | Attain Portfolio Advisors Modified Program | 67.76% | 11.04% | 2/07 | 250 |
| Ultramini ES | 36.70% | 23.12% | 8/03 | 15 | Parrot Trading Partners, LLC | 29.19% | 20.45% | 4/04 | 100 |
| Ultramini EMD | 75.49% | 26.30% | 8/03 | 15 | Financial Commodity Investments (FCI) Option Selling Strat. | 35.21% | 16.26% | 7/04 | 100 |
| Polaris NQ | 40.26% | 61.14% | 5/01 | 20 | NDX Capital Management Abednego Program | 15.68% | 4.80% | 10/06 | 100 |
| HP II Trader EMD | 21.33% | 39.55% | 5/02 | 20 | Zenith Resources Diversified Option Program | 16.75% | 4.86% | 4/05 | 35 |
| Important Risk Disclosure |
|||
|
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can
carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for
everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading
losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week |
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week |
***Overview***
The battle between a global economic slowdown and raging inflation kept many futures markets volatile last week. U.S. stock futures sold off on news of renewed problems in the mortgage sector. For the week S&P futures fell -2.33% with Dow futures not far behind losing -1.81%. The Tech sector held it’s own with NASDAQ futures ending near steady levels on renewed optimism on a Microsoft/Yahoo deal could be nearing a few final hurdles. The excitement filtered into the small-cap area with eh Russell gaining +1.53% and the Mid-cap ending near unchanged levels for the week.
Economic jitters supported metal prices, meanwhile; as buying of hard assets based investments led a flight-to-quality rally in the precious metals. For the week gold was up +2.92%, Silver rallied +2.40%, and Platinum ended +1.19%. The industrial metals did not fare quite as well as shaky economic conditions led to losses in both Copper -5.30% and Palladium -1.22%.
Currency trading basically stayed the mostly sideways course, although the economic jitters in the U.S. led the Dollar to decline -1.34% with the gains mostly picked up by the Euro +1.35%.
The grain and food sectors took a tumble last week as worries of poor world economic conditions along with a report showing larger than expected crops sparked a round of heavy selling. In the grains Corn led the way down -8.89%, followed by Wheat -6.56%, and Soybeans -2.25%. The losses in the food sector were just as severe as Cocoa was -7.25%, Coffee lost -6.46%, OJ was -5.35%. The livestock sector ended with mixed results as Lean Hogs moved ahead +4.96% while Live Cattle lost- 2.61% due in most part from news that South Korea was upping their imports of pork at the expense of beef as their consumers still do not feel comfortable eating beef since the past outbreak of mad cow disease.
In energy futures - Crude, RBOB, and Heating Oil ended the week steady, although Natural Gas posted losses of -12.43% on reports of larger than expected supplies and on ideas that the current mild summer in the U.S. would curb consumption.
***CTAs***
Welcome to index option expiration week! With the VIX up 18.9% MTD, and options set to expire this Friday, those option selling CTAs can’t see this Friday’s option expiration come soon enough.
The top index manger for the month so far has been Zephyr Aggressive, who is posting a gain of aprox +1.01%. Zephyr has traversed through a troubled period over the past year; however to start the 2nd quarter, they have made some strategic changes to their strategy that have paid off. They earned +9.41% in Q2 on the Aggressive program. Others in the black for the month include Zenith Index, Zenith Diversified, Zephyr Moderate, and LJM Partners. On the downside, for the most part, the losses have been controlled to under 4%, with the notable exception of Ascendant S1 who is down 14% from their near term high. Others in the red include Ace Investments (-2.62%), Cervino Diversified 2x (-1.77%), Cervino Diversified (-0.77%), Crescent Bay BVP and PSI (-3.95% and -3.36%), Diamond Capital (-0.09%), and Rathiel (-1.08%).
Commodity option mangers have continue to perform well earning; Cervino COP is ahead +1.51% and FCI is ahead +0.57%.
In the grain and agriculture markets, volatility remains high and subsequently promising for mangers. Toping the charts so far this month is Rosetta which is ahead +0.89% - Rosetta is in the midst of fighting its way back toward new equity highs after suffering a drawdown of aprox 15% in the 2nd quarter. In other trading Chicago Capital is ahead 0.36% for the month, NDX Abednego is down -0.19% and NDX Shadrach is down -1.89% for the month. NDX's drawdown comes following a run up of 8.0% and 25% respectively in June.
Multi-Market & trend following CTA’s have had a slow start to the second quarter of ’08. Historic high levels of volatility across all commodity market sectors has had many managers focused on capital preservation, which has led to fewer trades being put on and less activity for us to discuss. There are a couple managers who are up slightly in July including Northside Trading at approx +3.45%. Like most other managers Northside has been quiet, but does have a couple trades on in the currency futures and metals markets that are up so far this month. Next in line is the APA Modified program which is up +1.06% this month approximately. Both the APA Modified and APA Strategic Diversification (+0.29% est) Programs suffered pullbacks last week after unsuccessful trades in currencies, stock index and energy futures markets.
A couple of our more well known managers that we track, Dighton USA and Clarke Capital, have both cut down on trading and have been very quiet thus far in July. Dighton has not taken any new positions as of Friday 7/11/2008 and neither has the Clarke Basic Program, meanwhile the Clarke Magnum Program is down slightly at approx -0.55%.
On the more active side Robinson-Langley continues to look for trading opportunities and is down slightly at -0.81% approx this month. Hoffman Asset has also had a couple new positions but is in the red slightly at -2.22%. Managers that have found the going a little tougher include Optimus which is down -6.09% and Longterm Trading Navigator at -7.75% for the month.
***Trading Systems***
In the trading system arena, the continued volatility in global futures markets has put trading strategies to the test. Robust programs that were built to handle an array of trading conditions have passed this test with flying colors, while some of the programs that were built in the low volatility period of the past several years have struggled as of late.
Starting with the day trading systems, the top performer was Rayo Plus Dax which finished the week +$1,930.75 on a single trade from Friday. Compass SP was close behind +$1,245.25 on five trades after finishing the week with three losing trades. Waugh eRL had a similar result of +$1,238 on four trades. Bounce MOC eRL did exactly what it was designed to do- catch the rebound from an oversold market-and finished the week +$1,090 from the trade on Tuesday. On the losing side, BetaCon 4/1 ESX lost -$940.19 on two trades that were both stopped out.
Moving on to the swing systems, the programs that work on a longer time frame generally held their positions while some of the shorter term systems were in and out of trades throughout the week. Tzar eRL took a new short position last week joining the ES and NQ which have been holding short for a few weeks. Signum EBL and TY held onto their respective long positions and continue to recover from a tough stretch of trades in June. SeasonalST ES was successful on its short trade mid-week for +$1,470. Bounce eRL had a similar trade to the MOC system and picked up +$1,100 on the trade from Tuesday.
Elsewhere, Ultramini ES lost -$542.50 on one long trade from Friday that was stopped out. Mesa Notes was also stopped out of its short position in the Ten Year Note for a loss of -$2,800 on the closed out trade.
Trend following programs were relatively quiet as several commodities came back to life but did not break new highs to trigger entry signals. Programs that were stopped out of long energy positions early in the week wished they could have the trades back as they came roaring back towards the end of the week. Grain markets were lower for the week but will take further downside to trigger exits on long positions.
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can
carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for
everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading
losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week | Top 5 CTAs | Top 5 Systems |
Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results.
| Rank | Program Name | 12 month Return | 12 month Drawdown | Min Investment (k) |
| 1 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Millennium | 127.93% | 7.13% | $1,000 |
| 2 | Parrot Trading Partners, LLC | 132.83% | 11.48% | $100 |
| 3 | Attain Portfolio Advisors Modified Program | 92.11% | 9.89% | $250 |
| 4 | Clarke Capital Management, Inc. Worldwide | 73.21% | 7.57% | $250 |
| 5 | Pere Trading Group, LLC Pere Trading Program | 138.50% | 29.98% | $50 |
Figures listed are as of 7/14/2008.
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
The rankings above are the top ranked CTAs offered at Attain over the past 12 months using a risk adjusted ratio which equals the period return divided by the period DD.
Investments in CTAs can be subject to substantial charges for management and advisory fees. The % returns in the CTA table above include all such fees, but it may be necessary for those accounts that are subject to these charges to make substantial trading profits in the future to avoid depletion or exhaustion of their assets.
The regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) require that prospective clients of a CTA receive a disclosure document when they are solicited to enter into an agreement whereby the CTA will direct or guide the client's commodity interest trading and that certain risk factors be highlighted. The disclosure document contains a complete description of the principal risk factors and each fee to be charged to your account by the Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA). This document is readily accessible at this site using the Disclosure Document link at the Attain website.
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week | Top 5 CTAs | Top 5 Systems |
Hypothetical Model Accounts using Computer Generated and Actual Client Fills.
| Rank | System Name | 90 Day Return | Return in Dollars | 90 Day Drawdown | DD in Dollars | Min Investment (k) |
| 1 | Bounce ERL Swing | 10.18% | $1,018.00 | 0.76% | $76.00 | $10 |
| 2 | Ultramini EMD | 18.00% | $2,700.00 | 4.80% | $720.00 | $15 |
| 3 | Rho 12/12 DAX | 28.75% | $3,450.13 | 10.40% | $1,248.49 | $12 |
| 4 | Compass SP | 45.55% | $13,664.12 | 23.61% | $7,083.73 | $30 |
| 5 | Polaris NQ | 4.64% | $928.68 | 5.14% | $1,028.16 | $20 |
Figures listed are as of 7/14/2008.
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
The rankings above are the top ranked Trading Systems offered at Attain over the past 90 days using a risk adjusted ratio which equals the period return divided by the period DD.
The % returns in the trading system table above are hypothetical in that they represent returns in a model account. The model account rises or falls by the exact single contract profit and loss achieved by clients trading actual money pursuant to the listed system's trading signals on the appropriate dates, or if no actual client profit or loss available - by the hypothetical single contract profit and loss of trades generated by the system's trading signals over the test period. The hypothetical model account begins with the initial capital level listed, and is reset to that amount each month. The % returns reflect inclusion of commissions, fees, and the cost of the system. Commission and fee cost = # of monthly trades * $50.00 ($30 for eminis). The monthly cost of the system is subtracted from the net profit/loss prior to calculating the % return. For systems with one time purchase costs, the monthly cost is calculated by dividing the purchase cost by the number of months in the reporting period.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN; IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK OF ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT TRADING RESULTS.
THESE PERFORMANCE TABLES AND RESULTS ARE HYPOTHETICAL IN NATURE AND DO NOT REPRESENT TRADING IN ACTUAL ACCOUNTS.