CTA Investments versus Trading Systems Investments

May 24, 2004

 

If you are reading this newsletter for the first time or as a part of your weekly routine chances are that you have an interest in Managed Futures or Managed Futures products. Each week we write about various Trading Systems and CTA’s (Commodity Trading Advisors) and thought that we would take step back today to examine the difference between the two and determine the types of investors who are involved in each.

CTA’s and Trading System investors are the main components of the $85 + billion Managed Futures industry yet are attractive to two different types of investors.

CTA Investments

CTA’s are a subset of the hedge fund industry, and are individuals/companies who engage in the business of advising others on the purchase and sale of commodities or futures contracts. The CTA then charges a management and incentive fee for the advice and management of an account…typically 2% and 20% depending on the level of investment (All incentive fees are generally based on new equity high marks). The most successful CTA’s have long standing live performance records and are attractive to investors usually understanding of alternative investment opportunities - but lacking time to research and manage the 60+ world markets on a daily basis.

CTA’s are required to be registered with the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) and NFA (National Futures Association).

Following proprietary investment strategies most CTA’s attempt to achieve above average rates of return with minimal drawdown (peak to valley points in an equity curve). To achieve their goal of lower risk to reward (Sharpe Ratio – see below) most are involved in multiple investment strategies requiring investors to invest capital between $100k to $5 Million dollars per investment unit. At that time the manager has full control over the investment whereby the investor signs over power of attorney to the manager.

In addition to the fees mentioned above the later is often a reason investors steer clear of CTA based accounts. Many investors require more than a general description of the investment criteria used within a CTA managed account and can become frustrated when they believe that a poor trading decision was made. From our perspective this is why we have found the most success in placing our customers with CTA’s who utilize a 100% mechanical trading approach. We believe that for qualified individuals their involvement in a mechanical CTA can greatly improve the consistency of a diversified portfolio without the required management of the account.

Trading System Investments

A Trading System is a method of investing within a particular market via the use of 100% mechanical entry and exit criteria, based on parameters validated by historical testing on quantifiable data. A system can be as simple as entering a 10-point stop on every new position or as complex as using fractal analysis to signal trades. Most systems are derived from a technical analysis of current and past price action in an attempt to forecast future price direction. Using a computer, these results can be tested through millions of permutations to generate objective trading signals. When a developer's computerized trading signals are combined with sound money management principles, a "trading system" is created. Investors use these systems to trade the futures and/or securities markets to satisfy their individual desire to control and customize their investment program.

System Developers are not required to be registered with the CFTC or NFA, however many of them are now moving in that direction.

With the advent of the PC and new software capabilities, system trading is now a viable option for the individual investor, especially those with a desire to take control of their investment program. This "do-it-yourself" segment of the investing public is growing as evidenced by the dramatic trend toward electronic trading and publications such as Futures Truth.

Two words of caution to those still reading, is to "OVER CAPITALIZE". In our experience, much like the successful CTA’s mentioned above, the most successful system trading investor will look to diversify his/her account across multiple markets, systems, and time frames; however unlike the CTA the system trader has full control over the dollar amount and leverage of his/her investment. This simple fact leads many investors to fall into the social trap of investing only the minimum in attempt to achieve high percentage gains on capital. Without even knowing it an undercapitalized system trader may be leveraging up to 10 times that of a CTA account who is investing with 10 times as much capital hence increasing the volatility of the their account (see table below).

Considering the descriptions above it is possible for us to tie the two sectors together and determine the fundamental draw to managed futures is the ability for investors to mechanicalize their investments. Whether through a CTA or portfolio of Trading Systems profitable trading strategies start with a consistent approach to the market.

Consistency is difficult for many investors because decisions about money can be very emotional. Investors know that diversification is essential, but many have difficulty diversifying a portfolio. Additionally, money management and/or allocation of funds in a portfolio is crucial in order to balance risk. These three elements are the primary reason why so many traders are turning to systems and CTA’s.

IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.

Feature   |   Week In Review   |   Chart of the Week   |  

Chart of the Week : Benefits of the Contrarian style.

Feature   |   Week In Review   |   Chart of the Week   |  

Except where noted, the below Profits/Losses are based on closed out trades. $50 per R/T commission included ($30 per emini) Percentage gains based on developer recommended initial balances as listed at www.attainaccess.com.

***Day Trading***

The only way to describe last weeks trading conditions is "tough" as a couple large intraday swings in the market made life difficult for the day traders. For example on Wednesday the SP market opened nine points higher and traded an additional seven points higher to 1106.00. During the rally many systems entered the market long however danger loomed on the horizon as several large firms began selling and drove the market down to lows of 1086.00 stopping out long positions. A couple systems with reversal capability such as R-Mesa SP and Helix SP don’t mind these types of market moves but for the most part large intraday swings are not profitable for day traders.

The question that looms is if these market conditions continue will it be time to hit the panic button? Not quite yet, in fact, we expect these types of losses and drawdowns because each system has experienced them in the past. Whenever drawdowns occur that are within the boundaries of back testing it is proof once again that the system is trading correctly and profits could be right around the corner.

Due to the rough and tumble trading conditions profits were hard to come by last week. Two systems that stood out from the rest were Helix SP which made +$1520.00 per contract and Daybreaker SP which made +$1375.00 per contract. The Sextant reversal filter which can be traded with the Compass SP system took advantage of the up and down market conditions for profits of +$1745.00 per contract. In e-mini trading RC Success had a nice week as well making +$767.50 per e-mini SP contract.

The rest of the active day traders including Compass SP, Blue Wave SP, and AG Xtreme SP took losses. AG Xtreme fared the best out of this group losing -$2787.50 per contract, followed by Compass SP which lost -$3832.50 per contract. Blue Wave took the hardest hit losing -$6600.00 per contract as nothing went the systems way last week. In e-mini trading Sniper ES lost -$235.00 per contract and Cobalt NQ lost -$250.00 per contract.

***Swing Trading***

The swing traders had more success with swing trading strategies making money in both the stock indices and bond markets. I-Master e-MD was the top performer making +$2872.00 per contract in the e-mini Midcap market. I-master also continues to trade well in the e-mini Russell making +$190.00 per e-mini contract and is now up +$4998.00 per e-mini contract for the month. I-master ES and NQ took small losses with I-master ES losing -$206.00 per e-mini contract and I-master NQ losing -$100.00 per contract.

Delmar NQ and ER took losses as well with Delmar NQ losing -$310.00 per contract and Delmar e-RL losing -$1710.00 per contract. In bond swing trading both Mesa Bonds and Mesa Notes had a successful week. Mesa Bonds held long for most of the week making +$1137.50 after reversing short on Friday. Mesa Notes took the opposite approach holding short since mid – April and making +$1950.00 per ten year note contract.

***Long Term***

It was a quiet week for long term traders with only the grains and energy markets making significant news. Market saturation has caused a broad sell off across most of the grain markets including Soybeans, Corn and Wheat. Soybeans continue to be the most volatile market with thirty to fifty cent market moves ($1500 to $2500 per contract) which we’re rare in the past have become a common occurrence lately. Unfortunately the high risk market conditions have left most long term systems on the sidelines. Catscan III has taken full advantage of the market though making +$3645 in open trade profits on a short trade. Catscan was also active in the high grade copper market losing -$500.00 per contract.

As one might expect the energy markets continue to garner the most attention from traders and speculators. July crude prices continue to trade in the $40.00 per barrel range briefly dipping to a low of 39.60 per barrel in a round of profit taking late in the week. Heating oil, unleaded gas, and natural gas also continue trade higher and as we have mentioned here in the past a host of systems including Trendchannel, Synergy, Checkmate, Brix, Andromeda, and Aberration continue to hold long energy positions.

Please Login to: http://www.attainaccess.com for the latest updated statistics.

IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.

Feature   |   Week In Review   |   Chart of the Week   |