RISK in a 9/11 Type Market Crash - What can you Expect?
June 28, 2004
No one likes to talk about it - or think about it for that matter - but the specter of another 9/11 type terrorist attack is ever present in today's new look world of weekly bombings and beheadings. Many believe it is merely a matter of time before such an attack causes a severe market crash, and the disturbing but necessary question of how such a crash would affect your trading system investment must be acknowledged.
Many trading system investors think of the risk involved in their trading system in terms of stops and drawdowns only, thinking their worst case scenario for any one day is equal to the stop loss amount - between $1,250 and $2,500 for most day trading systems. This is a fair gauge of what to expect in normal market circumstances, but what about abnormal circumstances which see drastic spikes lower. In thinking in terms of worse case scenarios, it is important to remember just what a futures contract entails.
In the case of S&P 500 futures, investors who purchase or sell such contracts are in effect controlling an amount of money equal to the index value times the contract value of $250. At the S&P index's current value of approximately 1135, those buying or selling S&P futures are therefore controlling nearly $283,750 (1135*$250).
Most investors think nothing of holding a single S&P futures contract, but would be downright frightened to be holding $283,000 in stock during a market crash. It is important to recognize that they are one in the same thing as far as the risk to your portfolio is concerned.
So what type of move might one expect from another devastating terrorist attack. We need only look back to September 11th, 2001 for clues.. The S&P futures were not yet open that fateful morning as the planes hit the towers around 7:30 AM Chicago time, but the effect on the market was profound. Within seconds, S&P futures traded in the overnight Globex market had sold off over 40 points to lock limit down, then remained closed for 6 days before reopening another 40 points lower.
In the end, many investors were locked out of the market until it reopened at the lows on September 17th, a full 76.5 points lower, or 6.93%. Investors trapped on the wrong side of that move could have experienced losses of close to $20,000 per single S&P contract - quite a bit more than the $2,000 stop loss many rely on.
The one fortunate thing for trading system investors that day was that the attack did happen before the market was open. But it is important to realize such a move could happen in the future, and could happen during normal trading hours. The 9/11 sell off represented a 7% move, or approximately 3.5 times the average volatility(one standard deviation of recent prices). With volatility, or the standard deviation, being the first moment of measurement and labeled with the Greek symbol 'Sigma', multiples of that volatility are referred to as a multi-sigma events.
That such a move, a multi-sigma event, could happen in a single day should be nearly impossible statistically speaking. For normally distributed data, multi-sigma events greater than 3 should occur with the same frequency as unicorn sightings.
Given normally distributed data, the two sigma level should encompass 95.44997% of all occurrences, while a three sigma measurement should encompass 99.73002% of all occurrences. The four and five sigma confidence limits are 99.99366% and 99.99994% respectively. The odds of a 10 sigma event, therefore, are so remote as to be thought nearly impossible.
In the real world, however, and especially in the financial markets, statistically rare events occur with frightening regularity. Consider the market crash of October 1987 which saw a one day decline of 21%. That move was a 20-sigma event. Two years later in 1989 there was an 8% sell off representing a 7-sigma event. Multi-Sigma events aren't the exclusive domain of stock indices either. February 24th, 2003 saw Natural Gas prices rise 42% in a single day, representing a 12 sigma event.
These one day declines simply shouldn't have happened given the entire 100 year plus daily history of the stock market, yet there they were a mere two years apart. The real world equivalent would be boarding an airplane only to see every person on the plane as tall as 7 foot 6 inch Chinese basketball player Yao Ming.
Daily crashes representing five to ten sigma events can and will happen. They are rare indeed, but not as rare as we would expect from statistics. This means trading system investors can't be lulled to sleep by the current low volatility environment which pegs daily risk as a system's stop loss. Too many investors calculate their exposure based off these stop levels alone, or worse, on day trading margin requirements.
So whether you are trading a single contract on Compass, or multiple contracts across several different day trading systems, please be cognizant of the affect a 9/11 type attack could have on the market. A 7% drop in the S&P futures, or 75 points at current prices, without the ability to exit a long trade is a real possibility. That would be a loss of approximately $20,000 per contract, or nearly 10 times the expected loss. While this would not be the end of the world for those properly capitalized, the affect is magnified the more contracts and more systems you employ.
The table below shows the dollar losses(or gains if short) which would apply given a multi-sigma shock at the listed levels: 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, and 20 sigma events, multiplied times the given number of contracts. While we have listed multi-sigma events out to the 20-sigma level represented in the October 1997 crash, that sell off was not without opportunities to exit your position. It is the 3.5 sigma event of 9/11 which worries us, where investors could not get out until the market had fallen 7%. While the probability of anything more than a five sigma event happening without the opportunity to exit your position is indeed remote, it is still greater than zero.
The obvious question following the identification of this risk is: "What can we do about it?" The easiest way to hedge against it is to not trade, but that removes any chance of profits as well. Indeed, the very reason many day trading systems may be profitable on a short time frame is that they accept relatively small profits (2 to 5 points) in exchange for being exposed to potentially huge losses(75 points).
A better hedge and equally as simple would be to buy an out of the money put every time you are long across a set number of systems. An out of the money put would not change much in price even if the trade made money for the day, and you would lose no time value by getting into and out of the put within the same day. Of course, like all insurance, there are costs involved, and each investor must weigh those costs against the possible benefit in a worst case scenario.
- Jeff Malec
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can
carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for
everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading
losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week |
Feature | Week In Review | Chart of the Week |
Except where noted, the below Profits/Losses based on closed out trades. $50 per R/T commission included ($30 per emini) Percentage gains based on developer recommended initial balances as listed at www.attainaccess.com.
It was another slow but profitable week for the day trading systems. Summer trading conditions have been dominating the market; however there have been brief reprieves that have allowed systems to enter in trades. Wednesday was one of those opportunities as a large morning sell off was followed up by an equally impressive afternoon rally. The up move allowed several systems, including R-Mesa 5 and Day Breaker to take profits on long trades.
Outside of the stock indices trading was choppy in the bonds and foreign currencies with investors preparing for this week's interest rate decision. Finally, grains continued their slow but steady decline due to ideal growing condition weather in the Midwest.
**Day Trading**
Wednesday’s down and up session along with the Russell re-balancing on Friday led to a profitable week for several day traders. AG-Xtreme was the top performer making +$1950.00 per contract after trading three times. AG is one of the newer systems at Attain Capital and will be completing its three month trial period on Wednesday upon which the systems result will be added to our website.
R-Mesa 5 SP and Daybreaker SP both went long during Wednesday’s afternoon rally making +$1375.00 per contract and +$1150.00 per contract respectively. This was the only trade all week for both systems. Another beneficiary of the move was Blue Wave Zones SP which made +$1300.00 per contract. Blue Wave has rebounded nicely since a rough start to the month and was slightly profitable at the close of last week’s trading.
Compass SP benefited from the annual rebalancing of the Russell 2000 on Friday. The Russell 2000 which is used by many mutual funds as a benchmark adds and subtracts companies from its listings once a year leading to increased volatility on this day. Friday saw investors buy Russell contracts and sell SP 500 contracts in late afternoon trading. Compass SP benefited the most after going short just before the move and making +$565.00 per contract. Unfortunately, because the move occurred so late in the day Friday no other SP systems were able to take advantage.
In e-mini trading Sniper ES had its most impressive showing while trading at Attain making +$562.50 per unit traded. Impetus e-RL continued its winning streak making +$140.00 per contract while RC Success ES hit a bump in the road losing -$352.50 per contract.
**Swing Trading**
Despite the market activity Tzar and I-Master remained quiet. Both systems reversed long in the ES with Tzar ES losing -$392.50 per contract and I-master ES losing -$347.50 per contract. I-master also reversed twice in the e-MD losing -$770.00 per contract. Heading into this week I-master is holding long in the ES, NQ, e-RL, and e-MD. Tzar is holding long in the ES while holding short in the e-RL and NQ.
**Long Term**
It was a choppy week of trading in the bonds and currencies as traders jockey for position ahead of the Fed’s interest rate decision this week. Brix exited nice short trades in the bonds and notes for profits of +$3114.00 per contract in the bonds and +$2496.00 per contract in the notes. Meanwhile Synergy exited its long two year note position losing -$437.50 per contract and established a new long ten year note position. Mesa Bonds and Mesa Notes we’re unimpressed with the market and continue to hold long in both the bonds and ten years.
Grains continued their slow but steady downward move as growing conditions continue to improve despite the drought in the west. Systems with short positions include Brix which making +$425.00 per contract in the wheat. Andromeda is short in the KC Wheat for profits of +$825.00 per contract but the system is losing -$1400.00 on a short corn trade and -$986.00 on a short bean oil trade. Finally, both Synergy and Checkmate remain short in the cotton for profits of +$1800.00 per contract.
Please Login to: http://www.attainaccess.com for the latest updated statistics.
IMPORTANT RISK DISCLOSURE
Futures based investments are often complex and can
carry the risk of substantial losses. They are intended for sophisticated investors and are not suitable for
everyone. The ability to withstand losses and to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading
losses are material points which can adversely affect investor returns.